ArticleCureus2025
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Trigger Finger: A Minimally Invasive Office-Based Case.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trigger finger is frequently managed with conservative therapy and corticosteroid injections, while surgery is reserved for refractory cases. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative that allows direct visualization of the A1 pulley, flexor tendons, and surrounding neurovascular structures. We present the case of a 70-year-old man with Grade 3 stenosing tenosynovitis of the left middle finger and Grade 2 involvement of the left index finger who experienced only partial improvement after a landmark-based corticosteroid injection. He subsequently underwent ultrasound-guided A1 pulley fenestration with corticosteroid injection in both digits, resulting in complete resolution of pain, triggering, and functional limitation within two weeks. This case demonstrates the safety, efficiency, and clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided A1 pulley tenotomy as a quick, office-based intervention for patients who do not achieve full relief from conservative measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.