ArticleProstate international2025
Time to castrate the cost? the rising expense of chemical castration for the management of prostate cancer.
Article in Prostate international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visceral and subcutaneous fat attenuation as prognostic indicators of survival in castration resistant prostate cancer.Prostate international · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Role of OCT4 in Cancer Lineage Plasticity: A Cross-Cancer Perspective with an Emphasis on Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the backbone of treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Conventionally, this is achieved by means of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) analogs, though in recent years, four novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (nARPIs) have been approved for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. We aim to analyze the increase in cost of chemical castration in advanced prostate cancer associated with the introduction of these medications. Methods and methods: The publicly available Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme database was accessed for conventional ADT and nARPI prescription data between January 2010 and January 2024. The number of prescriptions and cost of prescriptions were categorized by month and state. A descriptive analysis was performed outlining the therapy-prescribing patterns and discordances at a national and state-/territory-based level. Results: From January 2010 to January 2024, over 1.7 million scripts were dispensed for conventional ADT compared to 412,925 for nAPRI therapy. The average cost for ADT rose from $9.9 million to 10.9 million. The average cost for nARPI therapy rose from $5.2 million to $17.3 million. There was significant difference between state-prescribing practices despite population-adjusted analysis. Conclusions: While intensified treatment has proven to improve prostate cancer survival, this had led to an exponential increase in the cost of treatment. Clinicians must exercise caution when prescribing these medications to ensure patients will appropriately benefit from their advantage to cancer-specific survival in the context of their overall health to ensure appropriate distribution of resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.