Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625776›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2026

Recent advances in lipid nanoparticles for cancer vaccine delivery: Challenges and future perspectives.

Nurhasni Hasan, Maryam Aftab, Sania Ikram, Apon Zaenal Mustofa, Sriwidodo Sriwidodo, Huda Shalahudin Darusman, Muhammad Nur Amir, Theofilus A Tockary, Satoshi Uchida

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nurhasni HasanFaculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Hasanuddin, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia.
Maryam AftabDepartment of Botany, Rawalpindi Women University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan.
Sania IkramDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Punjab 46000, Pakistan.
Apon Zaenal MustofaResearch Center for Genetic Engineering, Research Organization for Life Sciences and Environment, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor 16911, Indonesia.
Sriwidodo SriwidodoDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjajaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia.
Huda Shalahudin DarusmanBiotechnology, Multidisciplinary Program, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.
Muhammad Nur AmirFaculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Hasanuddin, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia.
Theofilus A TockaryInnovation Center of NanoMedicine (iCONM), Kawasaki Institute of Industrial Promotion, 3-25-14 Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki 210-0821, Japan.
Satoshi UchidaDepartment of Advanced Nanomedical Engineering, Medical Research Laboratory, Institute of Integrated Research, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains a major global health burden, with 19.3 million new cases and 10.3 million deaths reported in 2020. Conventional modalities such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy often fail to prevent metastasis or recurrence. Cancer vaccination, which mobilizes durable, tumor-specific immunity, has gained traction, and LNPs have become pivotal to this approach. Originally optimized for siRNA, LNPs' core-shell architecture protects nucleic acids, enhances cellular uptake, and enables efficient cytosolic delivery. Their clinical validation in infectious-disease messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines has catalyzed rapid progress toward oncology applications. Preclinical and early-phase trials have indicated that mRNA-LNPs encoding tumor-associated antigens or patient-specific neoantigens can expand cytotoxic T cells and elicit preliminary antitumor activity. Key barriers remain. Manufacturing cost and batch consistency challenge scale-up. Physicochemical instability necessitates cold-chain logistics and complicates global deployment. Reactogenicity and anti-PEG antibodies increase safety and dosing concerns. Within tumors, immunosuppressive microenvironments, heterogeneous antigen expression, and suboptimal lymphoid targeting limit the efficacy of vaccines. This review describes the advances in LNP design (ionizable and biodegradable lipids, PEG alternatives, ligand-mediated targeting), formulation strategies (thermostable and lyophilized systems), and delivery routes (intranodal and intratumoral) to overcome these bottlenecks. It also highlights synergistic combinations with checkpoint blockade, radiotherapy, and innate agonists, and examines emerging pipelines leveraging AI-guided neoantigen discovery and quality control. By integrating material engineering, immunology, and translational evidence, we identified failure points and proposed a roadmap for next-generation LNP-based cancer vaccines. The goal is to accelerate progress from bench to clinic, while improving manufacturability, access, and durable patient benefits.

Indexed as

Cancer therapyLipid nanoparticlesNeoantigensTumor microenvironmentVaccine

Identifiers

PMID41625776
PMCPMC12854052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.