ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
BOBM: an adaptive deep learning framework for extended-window sepsis prediction with cross-institutional generalizability.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sepsis, a life-threatening and costly condition, necessitates early detection for effective management. However, diagnostic and therapeutic delays are common. Furthermore, sepsis complexity and dynamics challenge existing early warning systems, impeding timely intervention. Methods: In this study, we introduce the Bayes-Optimized Boosting-Mamba Tab Model (BOBM), a novel deep learning-based algorithm that incorporates a bidirectional optimization learning mechanism within an ensemble framework. We designed dynamic agent models to enhance computational efficiency and adaptability across diverse clinical scenarios. Additionally, the model architecture was optimized for different temporal phases to enable a more precise estimation of the timing and progression of sepsis risk. To improve interpretability, we implemented SHapley Additive exPlanations value analysis, providing clinicians with actionable insights into potential patterns of sepsis progression. Results: The experimental evaluation demonstrated that our model attained the highest AUC (AUC: 0.86-0.95) in the MIMIC-IV dataset across different temporal windows prior to sepsis onset, confirming its adaptability and robust generalizability across various prediction timeframes. Furthermore, the model demonstrated superior performance (AUC: 0.978-0.982) when validated on two independent large-scale external datasets. Conclusion: In contrast to traditional prediction approaches, our model extends the potential intervention timeframe significantly, while incorporating dynamic monitoring capabilities spanning the 7- to 28-day window before clinical suspicion, thereby establishing a foundation for regional sepsis surveillance systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.