ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Novel variants of monogenic diabetes and impact of genetic diagnosis on treatment strategies.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monogenic diabetes (MD) is a rare form of diabetes resulting from single-gene defects. While diagnostic guidelines are well established for young patients, individuals >25 years are frequently overlooked, despite the clinical value of molecular diagnosis for personalized therapy. Aim: To evaluate genetic sequencing outcomes and their implications for treatment optimization in patients diagnosed with diabetes between 2017 and 2024 across all age groups. Methods: Among 509 individuals tested for suspected MD, 78 (60.3% female) had a confirmed molecular diagnosis. Genetic testing was performed in patients with negative pancreatic autoantibodies, a family history of diabetes, or stable hyperglycemia without insulin requirement. Results: The median age at MD diagnosis was 18.3 (4-68.1) years, with a median diabetes duration of 4.5 (0-50) years. Forty-three patients (55.1%) were diagnosed before age 25 and thirty-five (45.6%) after 25 years. GCK variants predominated in both groups (81.4% and 74.3%, respectively), followed by HNF1A, HNF4A, and HNF1B. After molecular confirmation, 75% (18/24) of eligible patients underwent actionable treatment changes according to genotype, while six did not benefit from therapy adjustment. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate a high diagnostic yield (15.3%) for MD and emphasize the need to broaden testing criteria to enable precise, gene-guided and on time treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.