ArticleSAGE open nursing
Learning Through Reflection in Nursing Education: Perspectives of Nursing Students.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Service-learning using the BOPPPS model in TCM nursing education: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As healthcare evolves due to demographic changes and new technologies, there is a pressing need for nursing education to emphasize reflective practices. Despite its importance, students often struggle with integrating reflection into their learning due to inconsistent guidance and a lack of structured support. Objective: This study explored nursing students' experiences and understanding of reflection, and how they engaged with it as a skill. Method: A qualitative exploratory design was employed, involving 22 1st- and 3rd-year nursing students. Data was collected through in-depth and focus group interviews, allowing for rich data collection through both interaction and individual insights. The data were analyzed using a six-step thematic process. The reporting followed the COREQ guidelines. Results: The analysis revealed two main themes, namely factors that support the reflection process and challenges of the reflection process with four subthemes: understanding the concept and purpose of reflection, educational structures and facilitation, lack of tools and structure in education, and power imbalances in relationships. Both 1st- and 3rd-year students found the concept of reflection broad and vague; however, 3rd-year students emphasized its practical applications. Both groups stressed the need for clear guidance and peer learning models to foster a supportive environment for reflection. Conclusion: This study identifies a gap between the ideal and actual experiences of reflection among nursing students. Both 1st- and 3rd-year students struggled to understand and apply reflection due to limited guidance. Education programs should introduce structured reflection training throughout the coursework, including consistent support from educators and supervisors. Addressing power imbalances could help establish a safe learning environment, enabling students to analyze their experiences both retrospectively and in real time. The findings offer insights that can enhance nursing education globally and contribute to the international knowledge base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.