ArticleSAGE open nursing
Nurses' Work Satisfaction With Electronic Medical Record Use and Associated Facilitators and Barriers in Palestine.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of diabetes self-management and glycemic control among patients with diabetes mellitus in conflict-affected Palestine.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Determinants of quality of life in type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients in Palestine: a comparative cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Needlestick and Sharps Injuries Among Nursing Students in Palestine: Prevalence, Reporting Practices, and Associated Factors.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Professional Experience, Perceived Overcrowding, and Workplace Violence Exposure Among Emergency Healthcare Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
- Perceptions of the Nursing Profession Among Palestinian Nursing Students Across Academic Years: A Cross-Sectional Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) have become essential tools in modern healthcare, enhancing efficiency, safety, and quality of care. However, multiple factors influence nurses' satisfaction with EMR use. Aim: To assess nurses' work satisfaction with EMR use and identify associated facilitators and barriers among nurses in Palestinian governmental hospitals. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative design was employed. A convenience sample of 190 nurses from medical and surgical wards was recruited. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire covering demographics, work environment variables, and an adapted version of the Nursing Work Satisfaction Questionnaire (NWSQ). Sample size was determined using G*Power software. Data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: Among 190 nurses, 51.1% were aged 20-30 years, with nearly equal gender distribution. Most (63.1%) had received EMR training, and 53.2% perceived the system as user-friendly. 52.1% were satisfied with their work using EMRs. Regression analysis demonstrated that ease of system use (β = 0.274, Conclusion: Nurses in Palestinian governmental hospitals reported moderate satisfaction with EMR use. Factors such as training, system usability, technical support, and age significantly contributed to satisfaction. Strengthening these areas may enhance the integration and effectiveness of EMRs in nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.