Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625704›Full record

ArticleJournal of migration and health2026

Participation behaviour of different migrant groups in breast cancer screening - palpation of the breast and mammography. Results from the German national cohort (NAKO).

Heiko Becher, Nadia Obi, Tilman Brand, Hermann Brenner, Laura Buschmann, Renée T Fortner, Karin Halina Greiser, Volker Harth, Wolfgang Hoffmann, André Karch and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of migration and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Heiko BecherHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nadia ObiInstitute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Hamburg University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Tilman BrandLeibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Laura BuschmannUniversität Münster, Institut für Epidemiologie und Sozialmedizin, Münster, Germany.
Renée T FortnerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karin Halina GreiserDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Volker HarthInstitute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine (ZfAM), University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannInstitut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
André KarchUniversität Münster, Institut für Epidemiologie und Sozialmedizin, Münster, Germany.
Thomas KeilInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmeditzin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander KluttigInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics, and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Lilian KristInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmeditzin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael LeitzmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Andy MaunInstitute Institute of General Practice / Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Rafael MikolajczykInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics, and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Katharina NimptschMax-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Molecular Epidemiology Research Group, Berlin, Germany.
Tobias PischonMax-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Molecular Epidemiology Research Group, Berlin, Germany.
Sabine SchipfInstitut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Börge SchmidtInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
Ulla T SchultheissInstitute of Genetic Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Matthias SchulzeDepartment of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany.
Hajo ZeebLeibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Christian WiessnerInstitute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Hamburg University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For early detection of breast cancer, clinical palpation of the breast is offered yearly to all women aged 30 and older, and the German Mammography Screening Programme (MSP) offers biennial mammograms to all women aged 50 to 75 years. We investigated the utilization of both screening methods across various migrant groups in Germany, as well as the effect of German language proficiency. Methods: Cross-sectional data on participation frequencies from the baseline examination (2014 to 2019) of more than 100,000 women of the German National Cohort study (NAKO) were analysed by migrant status. Adjusted logistic regression analyses were conducted for palpation and MSP to compare screening uptake among six migrant groups, and non-migrant population. Results: Palpation of the breast was less frequently utilized in all migrant groups with odds ratios ranging from 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.6) for Turkish women to 0.9 for women from western countries (95% CI 0.7-1.1) compared to autochthone Germans. Lower German language proficiency further decreases its use. In contrast, odds ratios for MSP participation did not differ substantially compared to Germans ranging from 0.8 to 1.2. German language proficiency had little effect on MSP participation. Discussion: In contrast to earlier studies, our findings suggest that MSP participation and motivation does not significantly differ by migration status or language skills. This may indicate that information on MSP is broadly accessible through established invitation procedures in Germany. However, lower uptake of breast palpation by a physician in some migrant populations highlights potential gaps in broader preventive care engagement.

Indexed as

Breast cancerBreast palpationMammography screeningMigrantsParticipation behaviour

Identifiers

PMID41625704
PMCPMC12856141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.