ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
A novel approach for accurate disease prediction: Application to heart and liver diseases.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart and liver diseases are among the leading causes of mortality globally. Their early detection can prevent complications, reduce costs, and ensure healthy lives and well-being for everyone. Machine learning-based predictive models, such as logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) are commonly used in health science for prediction. Even though LR and DT are effective, they have major drawbacks. DT assigns the same class to all observations in a branch which can lead to overfitting, while LR model often produces high misclassification rates and overfit when dealing with high-dimensional data. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a hybrid classification model combining the strengths of DT and LR. MATERIALS AND
methodsMonte Carlo simulation and empirical study are conducted to compare the predictive performance of the proposed model with LR, DT, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Random Forest. For the empirical study two datasets namely, heart disease prediction dataset (balanced, 303 observations, 14 variables) and Liver disease dataset (imbalanced, 583 observations, 11 variables) are used.
resultsThe simulation results indicate the hybrid model outperforms other classification models considered, across various sample sizes. These findings are consistent with the empirical data, showing predictive accuracy of 91% for heart disease and 95% for liver disease data.
conclusionThe developed hybrid model has enhanced prediction accuracy irrespective of sample size and effectively handles both balanced and imbalanced data, reducing the need to identify suitable balancing techniques. Improved efficiency can help with early detection, better decision-making, and improved health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.