Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625647›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025

Flashcards versus educational video: A comparison in order to promote laparoscopic surgical instrument learning.

Setareh Sadeghi, Mohammad Javad Tarrahi, Ahmad Ghadami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Setareh SadeghiDepartment of Operating Room, Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad Javad TarrahiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ahmad GhadamiDepartment of Operating Room, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince laparoscopic surgical instruments are sensitive and expensive; Therefore, it is necessary to use new methods to learn these tools, and due to the ease of use and the availability of flash cards and videos, as new educational tools, the present study aims to compare the effects of teaching laparoscopic tools with The use of flash cards and video training on the level of student 's education Operating room nursing was performed. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis semi-experimental, two-group pre-test-post-test study was conducted on 52 nursing students in the operating room program in 2023, who were included in the study through convenient sampling. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups of 26 using simple random allocation. The names of two classes, semesters 4 and 6, were provided to the statistics instructor, who evenly divided the individuals into two groups for training using flashcards and educational videos. The flashcards included 13 double-sided cards, with the tool's image and the tool's name along with its application. The educational video was a 6-minute researcher-made film. The content of both methods included tools used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, such as the clip applier, lens, Veress needle, Metzembaum scissors, fan-street, Maryland, J-hook, endo-clinch, wire cauter, and various trocars and ports. The data collection instrument included a researcher-made test with 20 multiple-choice questions, the content and face validity of which were assessed by 10 faculty members from Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, laparoscopic surgeons, and experienced operating room technologists. Additionally, 10 CVI forms were provided to validate the content of the learning test questionnaire, which assessed each question individually based on five criteria: necessity, importance, relevance, clarity, and simplicity. The final assessment was based on a formula. The minimum score for students at the end of each test was 0, and the maximum was 20. The reliability of the instrument was calculated using the Spearman-Brown score, yielding a result of 0.615, which was approved. Data were collected in two phases: before the intervention and two weeks after it. The data were analyzed using Chi-square tests, independent t-tests, paired t-tests, and a significance level of

resultsThe two groups did not show significant differences in terms of gender, age, GPA, academic term, or scores in theoretical courses on operating room tools and equipment, and surgical technology in gastrointestinal and endocrine areas (

conclusionThe results of the study indicated that training on laparoscopic tools in cholecystectomy using both flashcards and educational videos led to an increase in the students' learning outcomes. Therefore, it is recommended to use both methods as complementary educational tools in the training of operating room nursing students.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomyflashcardslaparoscopicoperating room nursingvideo training

Identifiers

PMID41625647
PMCPMC12854342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.