ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Community health providers' perceptions on the preference of caesarean section deliveries: A qualitative study in the state of Andhra Pradesh, India.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile Caesarean Sections (C-sections) can be life-saving in complicated deliveries, their overuse is linked to significant maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. This highlights the importance of understanding the factors that drive preferences for C-section deliveries. States like Andhra Pradesh exhibit an alarming trend of rising rates of C-section deliveries in India. This study aimed to explore community health providers' perceptions regarding the preference for caesarean delivery in Andhra Pradesh and to identify the major determinants of C-section preferences. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study utilized a qualitative research design, with focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted among community health providers from four districts of Andhra Pradesh. Participants were purposively sampled to gather a variety of viewpoints. A validated semi-structured questionnaire was employed to collect data. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically to extract key themes and sub-themes related to preferences for C-section deliveries.
resultsThe study identified a combination of medical, cultural, and systemic factors influencing C-section preferences. Community health providers underscored the advantages of normal deliveries but acknowledged the challenges they face due to family pressures and socio-cultural practices. Systemic issues, such as financial incentives in private healthcare and the increasing popularity of convenience-type elective C-sections or those that align with auspicious dates, also contributed to the preference for C-section deliveries.
conclusionThis study underscores the necessity for balanced, evidence-based practices to tackle the non-medical factors driving the rise in C-section deliveries. Promoting antenatal counselling, addressing maternal and familial concerns, and modifying institutional practices are critical for ensuring safe and well-informed delivery choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.