ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2025
Mobile health (mHealth) apps for ADHD: A systematic review of app quality and positive technology features.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have emerged as positive tools for enhancing physical and psychological well-being. These technologies offer valuable support for various mental health and behavioral conditions, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study systematically reviews and evaluates ADHD mobile apps using the mobile application rating scale (MARS) to evaluate app quality and the personal experience factors for positive technology to identify positive technology features of the apps. Using the PRISMA protocol, a search was conducted on the Apple App Store and Google Play for ADHD apps available in English, free, and with star ratings. Of 829 apps, 17 met the inclusion criteria: 12 from the Apple App Store and five from Google Play. Overall, the quality of the reviewed apps was moderate. App functionality contribute positively to app quality. The lack of engagement features, on the other hand, negatively affected ADHD app quality scores. These results indicate that mobile ADHD apps are primarily designed for psycho-education and to support users' in managing their ADHD, and not for social engagement. Positive correlations were found between the number of positive technological features and overall MARS scores." Features found in these apps positively correlate with higher engagement, improved aesthetics, and overall app quality. These findings underscore the importance of positive technological features in reinforcing user engagement and satisfaction, which is vital for improving the usability and effectiveness of ADHD mobile apps. The study offers a systematic method for user app selection that diverges from the traditional reliance on popularity influenced by crowd mentality. The study findings also provide a valuable resource for ADHD app developers, potentially encouraging the integration of positive technology features and evidence-based practices in mHealth app development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.