Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625631›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025

Assessment of sunscreen knowledge, attitudes, and practices among nursing students in Kuwait.

Seham Mustafa, Bashaer Baron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seham MustafaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Nursing, The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Shuwaikh Industrial, Kuwait.
Bashaer BaronDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Nursing, The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Shuwaikh Industrial, Kuwait.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArabian Gulf countries, including Kuwait, have intense sunlight that poses substantial risks to skin health due to harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation, leading to skin damage, premature aging, and increased cancer risks. This study assessed sunscreen knowledge, attitudes, and practices among nursing students, who are key agents in promoting health behaviors. Given that Kuwait has a single College of Nursing that attracts students from across the country, the sample represents the broader population. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 446 nursing students (50% male, 50% female), which is the quarter number of all the students from the College of Nursing in Kuwait between July and October 2024.

resultsGender differences were notable. Females exhibited a superior understanding of sunscreen's protective properties, including UVA/UVB coverage (75% vs 30% for males) and SPF effectiveness (72% vs 28% for males). Additionally, 41% of females used sunscreen year-round compared to 11% of males, who primarily used it during summer.

conclusionNursing students are pivotal in public health education but exhibit gaps in sunscreen knowledge and practices, with females demonstrating higher awareness than males. Gender-sensitive educational strategies in nursing curricula, alongside public health campaigns, should address misconceptions about sunscreen use and emphasize sun protection. Enhancing nursing students' understanding of sunscreen use equips them to advocate for sun protection practices, potentially reducing skin cancer risk and improving public health outcomes locally and globally.

Indexed as

Dermatologyeducationnursing studentspublic healthsun exposuresunscreenUV radiation

Identifiers

PMID41625631
PMCPMC12854326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.