Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625556›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025

Trends in the prevalence of early-onset cancer and associated early-life exposures among US adults: A serial cross-sectional study.

Xiaohong Kuang, Jian Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaohong KuangDepartment of Hematology, the Third Hospital of Mianyang, Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, China.
Jian LiDepartment of General Surgery, the Third Hospital of Mianyang, Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate trends in the prevalence of early-onset cancer and its association with early-life exposure among US adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized data from 10 survey cycles between 1999 and 2018 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Early-onset cancer was defined as the first malignancy diagnosed between the ages of 20 and 49. We conducted trend analyses to assess the prevalence of cancer and early-life exposures. Early-life exposures included diabetes, smoking, overweight and obesity that was experienced before the age of 50. Weighted logistic regression models were employed to identify associations between early-life exposure and early-onset cancer. The outcomes were average biennial percent changes (ABPCs), odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The prevalence of early-onset cancer increased significantly from 2.4 % (95 % CI: 2.0-3.1 %) in 1999-2000 to 3.9 % (95 % CI: 3.0-4.9 %) in 2017-2018, corresponding to an ABPC of 3.7 (95 % CI: 0.8 to 6.6). This increase was primarily observed in non-sex-specific cancers and men. With the exception of smoking, the prevalence of all early-life exposures increased significantly. Early-onset diabetes (OR 1.56, 95 % CI: 1.15-2.12) and early-life smoking (OR 1.55, 95 % CI: 1.34-1.80) were positively associated with early-onset cancer, whereas early-life obesity (OR 0.64, 95 % CI: 0.52-0.79) was negatively associated with early-onset cancer. Conclusion: The prevalence of early-onset cancer increased significantly among US adults between 1999 and 2018. Early-onset diabetes and early-life smoking are positively associated with early-onset cancer, whereas early-life obesity is negatively associated with early-onset cancer.

Indexed as

DiabetesEarly-onset cancerObesityPrevalenceSmoking

Identifiers

PMID41625556
PMCPMC12859450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.