Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625538›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025

Optimal urethral catheter removal time after robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the current evidence.

Panagiotis Mourmouris, Nikolaos Kostakopoulos, Omer Burak Argun, Ioannis Georgopoulos, Vasillios Klapsis, Nikolaos Pisiotis, Ioannis Salmas, Tunkut Doganca, Sotirios Charamoglis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Panagiotis MourmourisUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Nikolaos KostakopoulosUrology Department, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Omer Burak ArgunHealth Services of Vocational School, Medical Laboratory Techniques, Istanbul Kent University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ioannis GeorgopoulosUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Vasillios KlapsisUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Nikolaos PisiotisUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Ioannis SalmasUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Tunkut DogancaDepartment of Urology, Acibadem Taksim Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Sotirios CharamoglisUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robotic Radical Prostatectomy has become the dominant surgical approach for localized prostate cancer, offering offers many advantages in postoperative recovery and quality of life. Despite these advances, the standard duration of urethral catheterization- typically 7 days- has remained largely unchanged. Objective: To systematically evaluate the feasibility and safety of early urethral catheter removal after robotic radical prostatectomy and to identify the optimal timing for catheter removal. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Scopus databases were searched from inception to August 2025. Case reports, non robotic studies and non English publications were excluded Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non randomized studies and the Jadad scale for randomized controlled trials. Results: Thirteen studies involving 4.055 patients met inclusion criteria, including three randomized controlled trials. Early catheter removal was variably defined, most commonly between 1 and 4 post operative days. Across studies early removal was not associated with increased rates of anastomotic leakage, urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture. Continence recovery seams to be occur earlier with early removal although higher short term urinary retention rates were reported. Overall complications and readmission rates were low. Study quality was acceptable despite the limited evidence from high quality randomized studies. Conclusions: Early catheter removal after robotic radical prostatectomy appears both safe and feasible in appropriate selected patients and may accelerate continence recovery without compromising long-term outcomes. Catheter removal on postoperative days 3-4 appears to offer the most favora.

Indexed as

cathetercomplicationsprostate cancerrobotic radical prostatectomysurgery

Identifiers

PMID41625538
PMCPMC12852333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.