ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Biomechanical evaluation of a novel hockey-stick locking plate featuring a pes anserinus-sparing design: a finite element analysis.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical fixation for Schatzker IV tibial plateau fractures presents a clinical dilemma: achieving robust stability while avoiding impingement on the pes anserinus tendons. This study evaluated the biomechanical profile of a novel hockey-stick locking plate (NHLP), which is anatomically contoured to address this challenge by being placed anteriorly. Methods: A finite element model of a standardized Schatzker IV fracture was created. Three fixation methods were simulated: the novel hockey-stick locking plate (NHLP), the traditional T-shaped locking plate (TTLP), and the double reconstruction locking plates (DRLP). The models were subjected to four loading conditions: three physiological loads, a low axial load (500 N), a moderate combined load (1,500 N axial compression plus 150 N anterior shear force), and a high axial load (2,500 N) and a fourth "worst-case" load scenario combining a 1,700 N axial force, a 200 N anterior shear force, and a 10° varus tilt. Key biomechanical metrics, including implant stress, construct stability, fragment displacement, fracture interface mechanics and fatigue safety factor, were analyzed. Results: Under physiological loading, the NHLP construct demonstrated the lowest peak von Mises stress on the implant. At the high axial load of 2,500 N, the peak stress on the NHLP (159.8 MPa) was 15% lower than that on the TTLP (188.1 MPa) and 35% lower than that on the DRLP (245.5 MPa). In the "worst-case" scenario, all constructs exhibited high safety factors. In terms of stability, the NHLP provided displacement comparable to that of the TTLP, and both were substantially more stable than the DRLP construct, which exhibited the largest displacement under high load. Paradoxically, the DRLP construct consistently resulted in the highest degree of implant stress and the least stability. At the fracture interface, the NHLP maintained a stable environment across all loads, with key metrics remaining within a range conducive to bone healing. Conclusion: This finite element analysis demonstrated that the NHLP provides fracture stability while reducing peak implant stress under physiological loading. These findings support the biomechanical feasibility of its pes anserinus-sparing design, providing a strong rationale for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.