Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625519›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in science2025

The Earth BioGenome Project Phase II: illuminating the eukaryotic tree of life.

Mark Blaxter, Harris A Lewin, Federica DiPalma, Richard Challis, Manuela da Silva, Richard Durbin, Giulio Formenti, Nico Franz, Roderic Guigo, Peter W Harrison and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evolutionary dynamics of the arthropod molting machinery.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. AccuratebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Basis of Behavioral Diversity in a Sibling Species Trio.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Ensembl 2026.Nucleic acids research · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Parallel Selection for Longevity in Mammals and Birds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Mark BlaxterTree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Harris A LewinGlobal Futures Laboratory, Walton Center for Planetary Health, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Federica DiPalmaResearch and Innovation, Genome British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Richard ChallisTree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Manuela da SilvaFiocruz Biodiversity and Health Biobank, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Richard DurbinDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Giulio FormentiThe Vertebrate Genome Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States.
Nico FranzSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Roderic GuigoComputational Biology and Health Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Spain.
Peter W HarrisonEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Michael HillerLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics, Frankfurt, Germany.
Katharina J HoffInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Kerstin HoweTree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Erich D JarvisNeurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States.
Mara K N LawniczakTree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kerstin Lindblad-TohDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Debra J H MathewsBerman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Fergal J MartinEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Camila J MazzoniBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research, Berlin, Germany.
Ann M McCartneyGenomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.
Nicola MulderComputational Biology Division, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sadye PaezNeurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States.
Kim D PruittNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Verena RasComputational Biology Division, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Oliver A RyderConservation Science, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA, United States.
Lesley ShirleyTree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Franç Oise Thibaud-NissenNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Tandy WarnowDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Robert M WaterhouseEnvironmental Bioinformatics, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
EBP Community of Scientists

Funding

Wellcome Trust 206194Wellcome Trust 218328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Earth BioGenome Project (EBP) aims to "sequence life for the future of life" by generating high-quality reference genome sequences for all recognized eukaryotic species, thereby building a rich knowledge base to inform conservation, inspire bioindustry, ensure food security, advance medicine, and establish a deeper understanding of biodiversity. As the EBP works toward completing the original Phase I goal-a reference genome for each of the approximately 10,000 taxonomic families of eukaryotes-milestone publications have demonstrated the transformative potential of the project. The EBP has promoted global collaboration and established core methods and standards. By the end of 2024, EBP-affiliated projects had publicly released 2,000 high-quality genome assemblies, representing more than 500 eukaryotic families. In this article, we present a revised set of goals for Phases I and II of the EBP. For Phase II, we propose generating reference genomes for 150,000 species over 4 years, including representative genomes for at least 50% of all accepted genera and for additional species of biological and economic importance. To deliver Phase II, EBP-affiliated projects will have to release over 3,000 new genomes per month. We review the magnitude of the tasks in sourcing, sequencing, assembling, annotating, and analyzing genomes at this scale, and explore the scientific, technical, social, legal, ethical, and funding challenges associated with them. Success in Phase II will set the stage for sequencing the remaining ~1.5 million named species of Eukaryota and establishing the knowledge platforms necessary for understanding, preserving, and utilizing Earth's biodiversity in an era of rapid environmental change. Key points: The ongoing success of Phase I of the Earth Biogenome Project (EBP) demonstrates the feasibility of producing reference-quality genomes at scale, enabling the project to achieve its overarching goal: to sequence 1.67 million eukaryotic species in 10 years.Using knowledge from Phase I projects, we propose a revised strategy for Phase II: collecting specimens for 300,000 species and sequencing 150,000 species, representing at least half of the eukaryotic genera, in 4 years.Technical advances in DNA sequencing, genome assembly, and genome annotation have reduced costs and increased throughput to the point that we envisage globally distributed production of reference-quality genomes for most eukaryotic species for a total cost of about US$3.9 billion-US$800 million less than initially envisioned.Key challenges remain, including enhancing global coordination and building communities of users and interested parties; creating an inclusive, global biodiversity genomics workforce; developing effective access and benefit-sharing methodologies; facilitating collection at scale of vouchered specimens; sequencing reference genomes from single-celled and very small organisms; enhancing functional annotation; and building large-scale toolkits for comparative genomics.Technological and operational innovations, such as a "sequencing lab in a box," have the potential to radically transform the global capacity for biodiversity genome sequencing, facilitating national benefit-sharing agreements and the realization of societal impacts on Indigenous peoples and local communities.We propose the establishment of a US$0.5 billion Foundational Impact Project (FIF) fund to support the immediate use of the genome sequences in conservation, agriculture, biodiversity monitoring, biotechnology, and basic sciences, focused on supporting initiatives in the Global South.

Indexed as

annotationbiodiversityconservationDNA sequencingevolutiongenomics

Identifiers

PMID41625519
PMCPMC7618684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.