ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Pitch Counts and Injury Incidence in Major League Baseball: Responses to Pitch Clocks and Defender Rule Changes.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The implementation of the Major League Baseball (MLB) pitch clock in 2023 aimed to shorten game durations and enhance pace of play. However, concerns have been raised regarding its potential effect on pitcher health, particularly related to musculoskeletal and elbow-specific injuries. Purpose: To determine if recent MLB pitch clock rule changes have affected total pitch counts, time to first injury, total injury time, pitches per inning, total batters faced, or total musculoskeletal injuries for the 200 highest-volume pitchers across 2 full seasons postimplementation (2023 and 2024) as compared with 2 seasons before the change (2021 and 2022). Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Pitching and injury data were collected from the MLB official website for the 2021-2024 seasons. A total of 800 high-volume pitcher-specific seasons were evaluated, representing 290 individual pitchers over the 4 seasons. The 200 highest-volume pitchers by pitch count per season were included. Outcomes included total pitches, batters faced, time to first injury, total injuries, and injury type. Statistical comparisons were made between the preimplementation (2021-2022) and postimplementation (2023-2024) periods via Results: The total number of injuries decreased significantly, from 50.4% in the preimplementation period to 39.3% in the postimplementation period ( Conclusion: The current study shows that after the implementation of the MLB pitch clock, injury rates among high-volume pitchers decreased and time to first injury increased, with no significant rise in elbow injuries. These findings suggest that the pitch clock has not increased short-term injury risk, although ongoing research is needed to assess its long-term effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.