Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625505›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026

3D ZTE MRI Versus 3D CT for Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss: An Analysis of Agreement, Accuracy, and Cost Comparison.

Shankar S Thiru, Scott M Feeley, Christopher M Kuenze, Udit Rawat, Edward S Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shankar S ThiruGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Scott M FeeleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-9577
Christopher M KuenzeInova Sports Medicine, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9184-4636
Udit RawatFairfax Radiology Centers, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Edward S ChangInova Sports Medicine, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quantifying glenoid bone loss (GBL) in patients with shoulder instability is essential for guiding surgical management and determining the need for bone augmentation procedures. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement and cost-effectiveness of 3-dimensional (3D) zero echo time (ZTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with 3D computed tomography (CT) for assessing GBL. It was hypothesized that ZTE MRI would demonstrate strong concordance with CT and serve as a cost-effective, radiation-free alternative. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients undergoing MRI with both 3D ZTE and 2-dimensional proton density fat-saturated (PD FS) sequences, as well as 3D CT of the ipsilateral shoulder, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with recurrent instability between imaging studies were excluded. GBL was measured independently by 2 raters using the perfect-circle linear method. Interrater and intrarater reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Concordance with CT was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs). Cost-effectiveness was preliminarily assessed using institutional imaging charges and diagnostic agreement. Results: Eleven patients were included; 81.8% had ≥3 instability episodes. Mean GBL was 13.2% ± 9.3% (PD FS), 12.8% ± 8.9% (ZTE), and 12.7% ± 8.9% (CT). Inter- and intrarater reliability were excellent (ICC > 0.9). ZTE (CCC, 0.999; 95% CI, 0.997-0.999) and PD FS (CCC, 0.988; 95% CI, 0.974-0.994) demonstrated excellent agreement with CT. Estimated patient-billed costs were $1652 for CT + MRI, versus $1019 for either ZTE MRI or PD FS MRI alone. Corresponding institutional costs were $593 for CT + MRI and $329 for either ZTE or PD FS MRI. Conclusion: 3D ZTE MRI is a reliable and reproducible alternative to CT for quantifying GBL in shoulder instability. With excellent diagnostic agreement, elimination of ionizing radiation, and reduced costs, ZTE MRI may serve as a single-modality solution for preoperative evaluation in select patients.

Indexed as

3D CT3D ZTE MRIanterior shoulder instabilityglenoid bone loss

Identifiers

PMID41625505
PMCPMC12855769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.