Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625469›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in psychology2025

Imagine yourself as a little girl…-efficacy and psychophysiology of imagery techniques targeting adverse autobiographical childhood experiences- multi-arm randomised controlled trial.

Julia Bączek, Stanisław Karkosz, Magdalena Pietruch, Robert Szymański, Jarosław M Michałowski

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07048756 (Enhancing the Efficacy of Psychotherapeutic Imagery Techniques), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07048756 nacompletednot on this map

Enhancing the Efficacy of Psychotherapeutic Imagery Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Social Sciences and Humanities, WarsawRan2020 to 2022Enrolled220ConditionsFear of FailureArmsImagery Rescripting, Imagery Exposure, Imagery Rescripting with Disruption of Reconsolidation, Compassion-Focused Therapy Imagery Rescripting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia Bączek *Laboratory of Affective Neuroscience in Poznan, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.
Stanisław Karkosz *Laboratory of Affective Neuroscience in Poznan, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena PietruchLaboratory of Brain Imaging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Robert SzymańskiLaboratory of Affective Neuroscience in Poznan, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.
Jarosław M MichałowskiLaboratory of Affective Neuroscience in Poznan, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fear of failure is often rooted in highly self-critical autobiographical memories that elicit persistent distress and avoidance. Imagery-based interventions aim to reduce the impact of such memories, yet their mechanisms of action remain unclear. In this three-arm parallel group randomised controlled trial, 180 young adults with elevated fear of failure were randomly assigned to imagery exposure, standard imagery rescripting, or imagery rescripting with a 10-min delay designed to disrupt memory reconsolidation. Across four sessions delivered over 2 weeks, outcomes were assessed using self-report measures and physiological markers, with follow-ups at 3 and 6 months. All interventions led to significant and sustained reductions in negative emotions, arousal, and fear of failure, as well as decreased physiological reactivity to autobiographical memories of criticism. Contrary to predictions, delayed rescripting did not show superiority, while planned contrasts suggested more consistent benefits of standard rescripting compared to delayed rescripting and a rebound effect after exposure. Notably, prediction error, operationalised as transient increases in physiological arousal during rescripting, predicted stronger therapeutic change in rescripting but not in exposure. These findings demonstrate that both common therapeutic factors and prediction error contribute to durable improvements in emotional responses to adverse memories, advancing the understanding of mechanisms underlying imagery-based techniques. Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07048756, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT07048756.

Indexed as

fear of failureimagery exposureimagery rescriptingmemory reconsolidationprediction errorrandomised controlled trialsalivary alpha-amylaseskin conductance level

Identifiers

PMID41625469
PMCPMC12857063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.