Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625464›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Individuals adapt how they punish social norm violations through social observation.

Élise Désilets, Benoit Brisson, Aude Cossette-Toutant, Karolanne Balleux, Sébastien Hétu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Élise DésiletsDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Benoit BrissonDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Aude Cossette-ToutantDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Karolanne BalleuxDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Sébastien HétuDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Metanorms are informal rules about how to react to social norm violations. Since metanorms vary across groups, individuals must adapt their metanorms to match their local social environment's expectations. However, little is known about the mechanisms through which individuals learn and update their metanorms. The present study sought to investigate if individuals can use social observation, here observing the punitive behaviors of others, to adapt their metanorms. Methods: In an online task, 314 Canadian participants were asked to select a reaction (inaction, gossip, exclusion or confrontation) to a set of social norm violations before and after observing others who mostly used one type of punishment when faced with new social norm violations. Results: The results suggest that individuals use social observation to adapt their metanorms. Indeed, participants increased their use of the punishment they observed after observing others. This adaptation was characterized by a generalization effect suggesting that metanorm adaptation operates at an abstract level to identify the general patterns of reactions within a given social environment. Discussion: These findings provide initial evidence that metanorms can be shaped through social learning, opening new research directions to explore how this process varies across cultures, demographic groups and real-world social contexts.

Indexed as

adaptationconfrontationgossipmetanormspunishmentsocial exclusionsocial norms

Identifiers

PMID41625464
PMCPMC12855529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.