Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625458›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Psychological determinants of participation in the sharing economy: a cross-cultural study of the U.S. and China.

Jia Song, Sami Kajalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jia SongSchool of Management, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China.
Sami KajaloAalto University School of Business, Espoo, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study explores the psychological drivers of participation in the sharing economy through a cross-cultural lens, comparing consumer behavior in the United States and China. Methods: Drawing on the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy theory and the theory of reasoned action, we investigate how utilitarian, hedonic, and symbolic values shape attitudes, norms, and behavioral intentions in the context of collaborative consumption. Data were collected through online surveys from 302 participants in the U.S. and 305 in China and analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Results: Our findings reveal both similarities and differences in how personal values influence consumer decision-making. While utilitarian and hedonic values positively affect attitudes in both countries, symbolic value does not. Norms play culturally distinct roles: in the U.S., subjective norms are more predictive of intention, whereas in China, personal norms exert a stronger influence. Discussion: These results underscore the need for culturally adaptive strategies in the design and marketing of sharing economy platforms. The study contributes to cross-cultural consumer psychology by clarifying how values and norms shape collaborative consumption across distinct cultural contexts.

Indexed as

consumer psychologysharing economystructural equation modelingtheory of reasoned actionvalue–attitude–behavior

Identifiers

PMID41625458
PMCPMC12855571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.