ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Exploring the impact of family background and English as a foreign language teachers' feedback literacy on undergraduates' critical thinking styles.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The present study investigated the relationship between family background and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers' feedback literacy on the critical thinking styles of undergraduates in Chinese universities. Methods: We collected data from 1,454 undergraduates using the validated measures of the validated measures of the University of Florida Critical Thinking Inventory (UFCTI) and the EFL Teacher Feedback Literacy Scale. In addition, they reported on family background indicators, including parental education level, family income and family educational capital. We conducted chi-square tests and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses with two types of critical thinking styles as dependent variables. Results: The study revealed the following findings: (1) Students from more advantaged families were more likely to be Engagers, whereas students from less advantaged backgrounds were more likely to be Seekers. (2) Higher EFL teacher feedback literacy was associated with a greater likelihood of the Seeker style. (3) There was a significant interaction between family educational capital and EFL teacher feedback literacy; specifically, the effect of EFL teacher feedback literacy on critical thinking styles in students from families with lower educational capital was enhanced. Discussion: The results of this study indicate that critical thinking styles are contextually sensitive cognitive approaches, which impacted by both an individual's family background and the ecology of feedback received in EFL classes. Besides, educators and policymakers should design feedback and support systems that recognize style diversity while mitigating inequalities linked to family background.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.