ArticleJB & JS open access
ChatGPT-4o Mini Fabricates and Miscites Evidence for American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Hip Fracture Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Generative artificial intelligence and language models in trauma surgery : Applications in clinical care, research and teaching].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Article
- Generative artificial intelligence in medical education: from knowledge assessment to clinical reasoning and professional competence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) large language model (LLM) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, are increasingly used to answer medical questions. This study sought to assess the accuracy and quality of evidence cited in ChatGPT-4o mini responses to questions pertaining to hip fracture care. Methods: Prompt questions regarding hip fracture management that aligned with each of the 19 recommendations published in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults were posed to the ChatGPT-4o mini LLM asynchronously by 4 independent medical student graders. Three prompt variations were applied for each recommendation, reflecting the perspectives of a physician, a patient, and a general information seeker. Graders then requested from the LLM a reference list with PubMed Identifier (PMID) numbers supporting each recommendation. Accuracy and clarity of responses were assessed using a standard rubric for overlap with CPG citations, fabrications, and inaccurate citations. Results: ChatGPT-4o mini returned 228 responses to prompts seeking advice on AAOS CPG hip management recommendations. 76.3% of responses were "accurate" to the CPG recommendation. 88.2% of responses received a clarity rating of "excellent". ChatGPT-4o mini provided 228 responses citing 2,556 publications when prompted for supporting evidence, of which 1.1% overlapped with AAOS CPG references, and 7.9% were fabricated. Of the publications cited by the LLM which exist in the PubMed index, 91.7% were given with incorrect authors, 91.5% incorrect titles, 91.4% incorrect pages, 91.0% incorrect PMIDs, 90.9% incorrect journals, 90.3% incorrect journal volumes, and 20.0% incorrect publication years. Responses for an AAOS CPG strong recommendation strength were significantly more likely to be "accurate" (p < 0.001), and responses for an AAOS CPG limited strength recommendation were significantly more likely to be "unsupported" (p < 0.001). Conclusions: ChatGPT-4o mini provided clear, moderately accurate responses with rampantly erroneous and occasionally fabricated citations to queries about hip fracture care derived from the AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline on Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults. Level of Evidence: Level V Therapeutic. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.