ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Economic value and clinical association of a supervised lifestyle-improving program for MASLD.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06026293 (Retrospective and Prospective Study Aimed At the Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of the Cost/effectiveness Ratio of Physical Exercise on the Prognosis of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Retrospective and Prospective Study Aimed At the Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of the Cost/effectiveness Ratio of Physical Exercise on the Prognosis of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is both common and, in some cases, a progressive condition. Emerging pharmacological options have shown promise in select patient sub-groups (e.g., resmetirom for MASH with fibrosis; GLP-1 receptor agonists for obesity/diabetes with metabolic benefits), but structured lifestyle programs remain foundational in routine care. Objective: This study evaluates the cost-utility analysis of a multidisciplinary, kinesiology-supervised lifestyle-improving program for patients with MASLD, supported by clinical evidence. Methods: We analyzed 27 adults with MASLD, a cohort established from an initial group of 43 subjects, who participated in a structured program of supervised exercise and dietary counseling. Health-related quality of life (SF-36 mapped to EQ-5D) and associated clinical markers, including hepatic steatosis (ultrasound), blood pressure, and serum aminotransferases, were evaluated at baseline and after the program. A cost-utility analysis was conducted from the healthcare system's perspective, estimating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs and €/QALY) with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Pharmaceutical expenditures and projected disease progression costs were also explored using administrative data and literature-based models. Results: Health-related quality of life improved after the program, with a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.081 (95% CI: 0.001-0.161). The base-case ICER was €17,778/QALY. The probability of cost-effectiveness was 71% at €25,000/QALY, 84% at €30,000/QALY, and 95% at €40,000/QALY. Ultrasound steatosis showed a distributional shift toward lower grades with an unchanged median (Wilcoxon p = 0.007). Systolic/diastolic blood pressure decreased by -5.6/-3.7 mmHg (p = 0.05 and p = 0.03), and AST/ALT declined (both p < 0.01). At the 2-year follow-up, 55.6% of patients reported maintaining regular physical activity. Outpatient pharmaceutical expenditures showed a decline from €74 to €50 per patient/year between 2018 and 2021, with reduced variability across patients. However, this trend did not reach statistical significance in mixed-effects analyses (p = 0.06). Conclusion: In this pre-post observational study, the supervised program was associated with favorable cost-utility outcomes and distributional improvements in selected clinical markers. These findings support the program's potential value in routine care and warrant confirmation in controlled studies. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/expert-search?term, identifier NCT06026293.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.