Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625294›Full record

ArticleBiology and fertility of soils2026

Biochar reshapes soil bacterial community composition and survival strategies: a meta-analysis revealing trade-offs between microbial stability and functional complexity.

Jianwei Li, Jeewani H Peduruhewa, Robert W Brown, David R Chadwick, Robert I Griffiths, Haoran Fu, Hongfeng Bian, LianXi Sheng, Qinqxu Ma, Davey L Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology and fertility of soils, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Synergistic effects of biochar andFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jianwei LiState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130117 China.
Jeewani H PeduruhewaSchool of Environmental & Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2UW UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8883-9887
Robert W BrownSchool of Environmental & Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2UW UK.
David R ChadwickSchool of Environmental & Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2UW UK.
Robert I GriffithsSchool of Environmental & Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2UW UK.
Haoran FuZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058 China.
Hongfeng BianState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130117 China.
LianXi ShengState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130117 China.
Qinqxu MaZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058 China.
Davey L JonesSchool of Environmental & Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2UW UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a promising strategy for improving soil health and mitigating climate change, biochar has received increasing attention in recent years. However, findings regarding its microbial effects are often context-dependent, and the complex impacts of biochar on soil microbial communities remain inadequately understood. Here, we integrated 843 samples of 16 S rRNA sequencing data from 24 independent studies, utilizing machine learning and co-occurrence network analysis to evaluate general patterns and mechanisms by which biochar alters bacteria community composition and survival strategies. Overall, biochar significantly increased soil organic C, total N, pH, and reduced bulk density, which in turn affected microbial communities. While biochar addition did not notably alter bacterial α-diversity (Shannon index or species richness), it significantly changed β-diversity, indicating that biochar addition altered microbial community composition. Biochar changed community composition and survival strategies by reducing the oligotroph/copiotroph ratio, favouring copiotrophs groups (e.g., Bacteroidota). Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00374-025-01971-9.

Indexed as

BiocharCo-occurrence networkMachine learningMicrobial communitiesSoil organic matterSurvival strategies

Identifiers

PMID41625294
PMCPMC12855287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.