ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study based on randomized sampling.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is high among Chinese residents, and it is crucial to understand the current situation and intervene promptly. In this study, we investigated the current status of metabolic syndrome in some regions of China, analyzed related risk factors, and developed a risk prediction model to guide preventive measures. Methods: A multistage stratified cluster random sampling method was used to select 3541 permanent residents aged 18-79 years from a district in Beijing for face-to-face questionnaire surveys, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. All participants were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Correlation analysis and multivariate logistic regression were employed to identify risk factors for metabolic syndrome, and a column-line graph prediction model was developed. The discriminative ability and predictive accuracy of the model were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curves. Results: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in this study was 18.4%. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age, being male (OR = 1.827), being overweight (OR = 4.865), being obese (OR = 11.482), hazardous alcohol consumption (OR = 1.673), marital/cohabitation history, and specific occupations (agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and water production, and unemployed) were independent risk factors for metabolic syndrome ( Conclusions: The metabolic syndrome column-line diagram risk prediction model constructed in this study, based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, has good discriminative ability and high prediction accuracy. The model shows that a large proportion of the current risk factors for metabolic syndrome are modifiable, and that the risk of metabolic syndrome in high-risk groups, such as the elderly, men, people with marital/cohabitation histories, and people with specific occupations, can be reduced through behavioral and lifestyle interventions. This model can provide a scientific basis for the early identification of high-risk groups for metabolic syndrome and has an important guiding value for targeted preventive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.