Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625205›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

When those who benefit most participate least: socioeconomic inequalities in the well-being returns to civic engagement.

Xuan Ning, Tianzhu Nie, Yi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuan NingDepartment of Social Sciences, Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai, China.
Tianzhu NieDepartment of Social Sciences, Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Social Sciences, Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Voluntary associations are widely recognized as important sources of social connection and psychological well-being. Yet little is known about whether individuals from different socioeconomic status (SES) groups benefit equally from participation. Methods: Using data from the 2020 Canadian World Values Survey ( Results: Results show that individuals with higher SES are substantially more likely to belong to voluntary associations. However, the mental-health benefits of membership are not evenly distributed. Working-class respondents experience significantly larger gains in happiness and life satisfaction from additional memberships than service-class. Individuals with lower income reap more life satisfaction but not happiness from joining more associations, whereas people with less formal education gain more happiness but not life satisfaction than their higher-educated counterparts from joining more associations. Discussion: These findings reveal a mismatch: the groups that stand to gain the most from association participation are those least likely to join. Policies that reduce financial, informational, and structural barriers to participation may therefore yield disproportionate well-being benefits for disadvantaged populations.

Indexed as

association membershiphappinesslife satisfactionmental healthsocial economic status

Identifiers

PMID41625205
PMCPMC12852330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.