ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Effects of ball type and maturity status on U10 tennis players competition load.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensor-Based Monitoring of Heart-Rate Responses to Ball Type in 9-11-Year-Old Tennis Players: A Preliminary Bayesian Repeated-Measures Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of modified equipment in youth tennis, such as low-compression balls, is widely recommended to optimize learning, participation, and long-term athlete development. However, little is known about the physical demands imposed by these adaptations in under-10 (U10) competitive players, particularly when considering biological maturation. Methods: This study analyzed 72 simulated tournament matches involving 19 tennis players (10.17 ± 1.1 years; 14 boys, 5 girls). Each player competed under two conditions: green balls (25% lower compression) and standard balls. External load variables (active time, recoveries, and work-rest ratio) were recorded with WIMU Pro™ inertial devices, while covariates such as maturity offset (PHV), years of practice, physical activity level, jump height, and number of tournaments were considered. Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVA models were applied to assess differences. Results: Model comparisons consistently provided anecdotal to moderate evidence in favor of the null hypothesis for ball type, suggesting that any differences in external load between green and standard balls are likely trivial and of limited practical relevance, with wide credible intervals reflecting substantial individual variability. Conversely, biological maturation (PHV) emerged as the strongest predictor of active time and work-rest ratio, with players closer to their PHV showing reduced active time. Moderate to strong Bayes factors, together with credible intervals excluding zero, indicate a robust and meaningful influence of biological maturation on match demands. Discussion: These findings suggest that, in U10 tennis, low-compression balls provide a pedagogical advantage without increasing external load. Instead, biological maturation plays a decisive role in modulating match demands. Green balls represent a convenient and developmentally appropriate tool in U10 tennis, but coaches should therefore prioritize maturity-based individualization of training and guiding the transition to standard ball, rather than relying solely on chronological age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.