Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625170›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Interim Analysis of Pro-Grid: A Phase 1 Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Trial.

Khadija Sheikh, Anh Tran, Heng Li, Anna W LaVigne, Jean L Wright, Aditya Halthore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Khadija SheikhDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Anh TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Heng LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Anna W LaVigneDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jean L WrightDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Aditya HalthoreDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Spatial fractionation (SFRT) is a radiation therapy technique that targets bulky tumors by delivering alternating high and low doses within the tumor. Here, we report an interim analysis of a phase 1 trial examining the feasibility and safety of a novel proton SFRT approach. Methods and Materials: Ten patients with unresectable tumors of varying histopathology measuring at least 7 cm in the palliative setting were enrolled in a prospective phase 1 trial. Robust pencil-beam scanning proton SFRT plans were created using cylindrical (grid) targets within gross tumor treated to a prescription dose of 18 Gy in a single fraction. Quality assurance computed tomography imaging (qCT) was performed before treatment delivery. Results: Four patients had breast primaries, 3 patients had lung primaries, and 3 patients had pelvic primaries. Five patients had prior photon treatment to a different site. Eight patients received additional planned normofractionated radiation therapy totaling an average dose of 30 Gy. Median time from SFRT treatment to last follow-up was 25 weeks (range, 4-60 weeks). Gross tumor volume ranged from 151 cm³ to 1638 cm³. All qCTs maintained robustness, with no re-planning needed. At last follow-up, 40% showed partial response, 20% had stable disease, and 40% experienced disease progression, with half progressing in the treated area. One patient with pelvic treatment developed grade 3 small bowel obstruction, followed by late grade 2 obstructions. No other patients had grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities attributable to the proton SFRT. Conclusions: Spatial fractionation using a novel pencil-beam scanning SFRT technique was technically feasible to deliver and reliable on robust evaluation of qCT in this small prospective cohort of patients with difficult-to-manage bulky tumors. Proton SFRT appears safe even when additional normofractionated radiation therapy is delivered. Some bulky tumors exhibited significant response to proton SFRT; thus, further work elucidating which patients most benefit from this technique is warranted.

Identifiers

PMID41625170
PMCPMC12859408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.