Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625127›Full record

ArticleCanadian respiratory journal2026

Genetically Raised Circulating Levels of Dietary Antioxidants and the Association With Respiratory Health in High-Risk Populations.

A Saied, L J Horsfall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian respiratory journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A SaiedUniversity College London Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-9246-5055
L J HorsfallUniversity College London Institute of Health Informatics, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0868-5660

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Observational studies of raised dietary antioxidants suggest a beneficial effect on respiratory health; however, findings from interventional trials have been inconsistent or null. Few studies have specifically targeted individuals exposed to high levels of environmental oxidants, where the antioxidant effects may be more pronounced. Objectives: To investigate whether genetically elevated serum levels of dietary antioxidants are causally associated with improved lung function and whether these effects differ with exposure to oxidative stress. Methods: We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study using summary-level data for genetic associations with serum levels of ascorbic acid (vitamin C), retinol (vitamin A), and β-carotene from published genome-wide association studies. Outcome data on forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV Results: We found no consistent evidence that genetically elevated serum antioxidant levels are associated with improved lung function. There was no evidence of effect modification by exposures linked to oxidative stress, including cigarette smoke, air pollution, or dietary factors. Conclusions: Our findings align with those of previous interventional studies, showing no consistent causal relationship between dietary antioxidants and respiratory health. Moreover, we found no strong support for targeted interventions to increase serum antioxidant levels in people exposed to high levels of environmental oxidants (Wellcome Grant ID: 209207/Z/17/Z and 225195/Z/22/Z).

Indexed as

AntioxidantsAscorbic Acidbeta CaroteneDietForced Expiratory VolumeGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisOxidative StressPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUnited KingdomVital CapacityVitamin AAntioxidantsAscorbic Acidbeta CaroteneVitamin Aantioxidantdietlung functionMendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID41625127
PMCPMC12860137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.