ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Giant skull base meningiomas: Definitions, case reports, and surgical approaches.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Giant skull base meningiomas are rare and surgically demanding due to proximity to critical neurovascular structures, prolonged operative time, and reduced resection rates. Reports encompassing multiple skull base regions remain limited. This case-based series includes anterior, middle, and posterior fossa tumors, emphasizing anatomical diversity and surgical strategies. Case Description: Eleven patients with giant skull base meningiomas were retrospectively reviewed, including tumors ≥5 cm and surgically complex lesions. The mean age was 47.7 years (range 32-62), with a female predominance (8 females, 3 males). Presenting symptoms included visual loss, headache, anosmia, hemiparesis, and cranial nerve deficits. Approaches were tailored to tumor location, most commonly pterional and retrosigmoid, followed by bifrontal and combined skull base craniotomies. Gross total resection was achieved in 8 of 11 patients (72.7%). Near-total or subtotal resection (3/11) was performed when tumors encased critical neurovascular structures. Visual outcomes were favorable, with recovery or preservation in most anterior and middle fossa cases. Transient cranial nerve palsies occurred in two patients and resolved on follow-up. No postoperative mortality occurred. During follow-up ranging from 4 months to 5 years, no recurrences were observed, and residual disease remained stable. Conclusion: This series illustrates the anatomical spectrum and surgical complexity of giant skull base meningiomas. Favorable outcomes were achieved with individualized approaches and multidisciplinary planning. These cases contribute practical insights to the limited literature and reinforce the need for tailored management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.