ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Predicting outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective analysis of clinical, radiological, and laboratory indicators.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of two automated pupillometry indices in patients with acute brain injury: the prospective multicentre LYNX cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a primary cause of mortality and disability globally, with severe cases often resulting in long-term impairment. This study investigated key admission characteristics that predict outcomes in severe TBI patients, enhancing early mortality prediction through a comprehensive prognostic tool. Methods: This prospective study involved 240 patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] ≤8) admitted to our university hospitals over 2.5 years. Clinical, radiological, and laboratory data were collected, including GCS, Best motor response (BMR), pupil reactivity, hypotension, and the Marshall computed tomography (CT) score. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) pulsatility index (PI) and S100B protein levels were also assessed. Outcomes were assessed by the Glasgow outcome score (GOS). Results: Key findings demonstrated significant correlations between GCS, BMR, pupil reactivity, hypotension, and CT scores with GOS outcomes. Lower GCS scores and higher PI on Day 3 were associated with increased mortality. The madras head injury prognostic scale (MHIPS) effectively predicted outcomes with a strong correlation to GOS ( Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of integrating clinical, radiological, and laboratory parameters into prognostic models for severe TBI. The findings emphasize the predictive power of the TCD-measured PI and S100B protein levels as practical tools for estimating patient outcomes and mortality risk, facilitating improved clinical decision-making and resource allocation in intensive care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.