ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Patient-reported outcomes with a personalized follow-up program after lung cancer resection: A single-center randomized controlled trial.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06483295 (Randomized Controlled Study on Improving Patient-reported Outcomes After Lung Cancer Surgery With Mobile Internet Platform), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Study on Improving Patient-reported Outcomes After Lung Cancer Surgery With Mobile Internet Platform
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to determine the impact of PROM with a personalized follow-up program on the evaluation of quality of life and self-management for patients after lung cancer resection. Methods: Given a formal power calculation a total of 240 patients with lung cancer. Participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental or the control groups. Patients in the experimental group received a personalized follow-up program of patient-reported outcomes. The control group received only the telephone follow-up. Baseline data (T0) were collected before the intervention (on the day of discharge), and quality of life, self-efficacy, and compliance were measured at 2 weeks (T1), 4 weeks (T2), and 4 months (T3) post-discharge. Results: The difference in quality of life between the experimental and control groups was significant (Wald χ Conclusions: For patients after lung cancer surgery, the program has optimized the evaluation of postoperative quality of life and self-management efficacy. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (NCT06483295).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.