ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Multianalyte nano-biosensor diagnostics: advances through microfluidic and AI integration.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioassays in Allergy: Technical Characteristics, Limitations, and Pathways to Clinical Implementation-An EAACI Position Paper.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Review
- Microfluidic-assisted metal nanoparticle synthesis: emerging trends toward optical sensing applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- In Vivo Continuous Biosensing: Design Considerations and Emerging Technologies.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Rapid diagnostics innovations for urinary tract infections using molecular biology, artificial intelligence and antimicrobial resistance surveillance: a comprehensive review.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Phenotype-Guided Nanotherapeutic Strategies for Carbapenem-ResistantPharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Optical Biosensors-Principles of Operation and Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Electrochemical Stripping Analysis at Paper-Based (Bio)Sensors: Current State-of-the-Art and Prospects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in nano-biosensors are reshaping clinical diagnostics by enabling multiplexed biomarker detection with high sensitivity and precision. This mini-review examines both the opportunities and challenges in translating nano-biosensor technologies toward clinically relevant point-of-care (PoC) and wearable devices. We emphasize the integration of multiplexing strategies with microfluidic platforms and adaptive artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, which together enable real-time, high-throughput, and personalized health monitoring. Electrochemical and optical transduction approaches for multi-biomarker diagnostics are discussed, along with the role of microfluidic integration in enhancing sensor performance through precise sample processing, reduced reagent use, and simultaneous biomarker detection. A comparative overview of multiplexing approaches, including spatial, spectral, and temporal encoding is presented, with particular attention to sensor surface regeneration for device reusability. Furthermore, we explore the role of adaptive AI algorithms in individualising diagnostics to diverse patient groups while addressing key ethical and regulatory considerations such as algorithm transparency, patient data protection, and compliance with evolving medical device standards. By drawing together insights across nano-biosensor design, microfluidics, and AI, this mini review provides practical guidance for advancing next-generation diagnostic platforms toward clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.