ArticleCureus2026
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice About Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medical Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Self-Reported Familiarity With AI in Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence readiness in Pakistan's medical and dental education: training-phase decline, a knowledge-practice paradox, and the role of digital determinants of health.Medical education online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is already used in many areas such as medical imaging, diagnosis, treatment planning, and drug development. Teaching and formal training about AI in medical schools is limited, especially in low- and middle-income countries. There is little evidence on what medical students know about AI, how they feel about it, and how they actually use it in study and research. Hence, this study assessed knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to AI among undergraduate and postgraduate students at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur, among undergraduate (MBBS) and postgraduate (MD/MS) students, with a total of 317 students. A structured, pre-validated questionnaire was administered using a hard copy. The survey comprised four sections: demographic details, knowledge, attitude, and practice. Results A total of 317 medical students participated, with 188 (59.3%) undergraduates and 129 (40.7%) postgraduates. Most had basic knowledge of AI, though few had formal training. Attitudes were largely positive, with strong support for including AI in medical education and awareness of ethical issues. Students reported frequent use of AI in study, research, and brainstorming, but less for career guidance. Conclusion Medical students have moderate knowledge of AI and positive attitudes toward its use in healthcare, but actual use is low due to limited training, concerns about accuracy, and lack of integration, highlighting the need for focused education and practical exposure to AI tools in medical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.