Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625040›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice About Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Sumit Prasad, Anant Khot, Ganesh Dakhale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sumit PrasadPharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, IND.
Anant KhotPharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, IND.
Ganesh DakhalePharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is already used in many areas such as medical imaging, diagnosis, treatment planning, and drug development. Teaching and formal training about AI in medical schools is limited, especially in low- and middle-income countries. There is little evidence on what medical students know about AI, how they feel about it, and how they actually use it in study and research. Hence, this study assessed knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to AI among undergraduate and postgraduate students at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur, among undergraduate (MBBS) and postgraduate (MD/MS) students, with a total of 317 students. A structured, pre-validated questionnaire was administered using a hard copy. The survey comprised four sections: demographic details, knowledge, attitude, and practice.  Results A total of 317 medical students participated, with 188 (59.3%) undergraduates and 129 (40.7%) postgraduates. Most had basic knowledge of AI, though few had formal training. Attitudes were largely positive, with strong support for including AI in medical education and awareness of ethical issues. Students reported frequent use of AI in study, research, and brainstorming, but less for career guidance. Conclusion Medical students have moderate knowledge of AI and positive attitudes toward its use in healthcare, but actual use is low due to limited training, concerns about accuracy, and lack of integration, highlighting the need for focused education and practical exposure to AI tools in medical training.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (ai) in medicinecrosssectional studykap studymedical educationmedical students

Identifiers

PMID41625040
PMCPMC12860493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.