Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625037›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Continuum of Care and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Rural India: An Ambispective Cohort Study.

Umesh Joshi, Ila Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Umesh JoshiPediatrics and Neonatology, KD Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Mathura, IND.
Ila SharmaPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Government Medical College, Kota, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Neurodevelopmental impairments (NDI) remain a major contributor to long-term disability in children, particularly in rural settings where awareness, early recognition, and continuity of care are limited. Fragmented care-seeking patterns and delayed diagnosis often influence developmental outcomes in these regions. We aimed to compare neurodevelopmental outcomes between children presenting directly to the outpatient department (OPD) and those enrolled in a structured high-risk follow-up programme, and to evaluate the influence of adherence, psychosocial factors, and healthcare access on treatment response. Methods and material A total of 73 children with documented perinatal risk factors and mild-moderate NDI were included. Data for the follow-up cohort were retrieved retrospectively from hospital records, whereas OPD children were assessed prospectively. Neurodevelopmental scores (NDS), developmental quotient (DQ)/intelligence quotient (IQ), behavioural profiles, and psychosocial risk factors were recorded. Improvement was measured as a percentage reduction in symptom severity after six months of therapy. Adherence levels and patterns of healthcare access were analysed. Logistic regression with multiple imputation was used to identify predictors of ≥20% improvement. Results Baseline NDS did not differ significantly between groups. Children from the follow-up cohort demonstrated more consistent improvement, with 85% achieving a ≥20% reduction in symptoms, compared with 41% of OPD children. The OPD group showed improvement mainly in behavioural symptoms, whereas the follow-up group demonstrated additional gains in IQ and academic performance. Psychosocial adversity, anaemia prevalence, and low adherence were substantially more common in the OPD cohort. Logistic regression did not identify any single independent predictor of improvement, although adherence showed the strongest clinical association. Conclusions Children enrolled in structured follow-up programmes achieved more stable and multidimensional neurodevelopmental gains than those presenting directly to OPD care. Poor adherence, psychosocial adversity, and delayed recognition of developmental concerns contributed to weaker outcomes in the OPD group. Strengthening continuum-of-care pathways and improving caregiver awareness are essential for optimising neurodevelopmental outcomes in rural settings.

Indexed as

adherencedevelopmental outcomesfollow-up programmeneurodevelopmental impairmentoutpatient careprematurityrural health

Identifiers

PMID41625037
PMCPMC12859520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.