Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625036›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Moving Beyond Sorry: The Acknowledge-Repair-Prevent (ARP) Framework for Colleague Apologies in Medicine.

Thomas F Heston

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas F HestonMedical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient apologies are institutionalized in medicine through training, legal protections, and institutional programs. Colleague apologies remain rare despite frequent harms from hierarchy, bullying, and dismissal. This perspective examines why institutions mandate patient apologies but ignore colleague harm, despite evidence that unaddressed workplace conflict drives turnover, worsens burnout, and fractures the communication essential for coordinated care. Studies show that a majority of clinicians report that conflicts affect care quality, with nearly half perceiving possible harm to patient survival in intensive care settings. Existing apology models restore immediate dignity but lack prevention components. The proposed Acknowledge-Repair-Prevent (ARP) framework adds concrete prevention steps as systemic quality improvement measures and emphasizes restorative over retributive justice. Implementing ARP requires addressing structural barriers, including hierarchy and ego. The framework could rebuild the internal trust that sustains patient safety culture.

Indexed as

colleague apologiesmedical hierarchyprofessional accountabilityrestorative justiceworkplace conflict

Identifiers

PMID41625036
PMCPMC12854781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.