ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
A practical guide to the implementation of AI in orthopaedic research part 8: Resource management checklist for AI-driven research projects in orthopaedics.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A practical guide to the implementation of AI in orthopaedic research part 8: Resource management checklist for AI-driven research projects in orthopaedics.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming a multitude of medical fields, including orthopaedic surgery. AI-driven approaches such as machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing and large language models are being increasingly employed across various aspects of orthopaedic practice, offering innovative solutions for diagnostics, patient care and surgical training. To successfully execute an AI-driven orthopaedic project, the initial step involves defining the aim and rationale of the project. The study must be designed to answer a clinically relevant topic in a way that influences the behavior of the health professional and leads to better patient outcomes. Once this planning phase is complete, selecting the most appropriate AI model becomes crucial, as models differ in applications, costs and required staff expertise. After model selection, successful AI implementation demands ongoing monitoring and adaptation to ensure optimal performance and reliability. Achieving the best and most ethical outcomes requires interdisciplinary collaboration, combining clinical expertise with technological proficiency. Ultimately, a comprehensive approach to AI integration can lead to transformative advancements in orthopaedic surgery and medical research, paving the way for improved patient care and innovative treatment solutions. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.