Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625019›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026

A practical guide to the implementation of AI in orthopaedic research part 8: Resource management checklist for AI-driven research projects in orthopaedics.

Umile Giuseppe Longo, Benedetta Bandini, Maristella Saccomanno, Pieter D'Hooghe, Bálint Zsidai, Jacob F Oeding, Felix Conrad Oettl, Kristian Samuelsson, Alessandro De Sire, Robert Feldt and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Umile Giuseppe LongoFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4063-9821
Benedetta BandiniFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.
Maristella SaccomannoDepartment of Bone and Joint Surgery Spedali Civili Brescia Italy.
Pieter D'HoogheAspetar Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Aspire Zone Doha Qatar.
Bálint ZsidaiSahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center Gothenburg Sweden.
Jacob F OedingDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Felix Conrad OettlDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery Balgrist University Hospital University of Zürich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9721-685X
Kristian SamuelssonSahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5383-3370
Alessandro De SireDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Catanzaro "Magna Grecia" Catanzaro Italy.
Robert FeldtDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden.
Yinan YuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden.
ESSKA Artificial Intelligence Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming a multitude of medical fields, including orthopaedic surgery. AI-driven approaches such as machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing and large language models are being increasingly employed across various aspects of orthopaedic practice, offering innovative solutions for diagnostics, patient care and surgical training. To successfully execute an AI-driven orthopaedic project, the initial step involves defining the aim and rationale of the project. The study must be designed to answer a clinically relevant topic in a way that influences the behavior of the health professional and leads to better patient outcomes. Once this planning phase is complete, selecting the most appropriate AI model becomes crucial, as models differ in applications, costs and required staff expertise. After model selection, successful AI implementation demands ongoing monitoring and adaptation to ensure optimal performance and reliability. Achieving the best and most ethical outcomes requires interdisciplinary collaboration, combining clinical expertise with technological proficiency. Ultimately, a comprehensive approach to AI integration can lead to transformative advancements in orthopaedic surgery and medical research, paving the way for improved patient care and innovative treatment solutions. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencechecklistorthopaedicsprojectresource management

Identifiers

PMID41625019
PMCPMC12859751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.