Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624973›Full record

ArticleNature machine intelligence2026

Assessing the potential of deep learning for protein-ligand docking.

Alex Morehead, Nabin Giri, Jian Liu, Pawan Neupane, Jianlin Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular dockingDigital discovery · 2026
    Article
  2. Toward mechanistic virtual immune cells.Nature biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. RiboScreenBiomedicines · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Therapeutic peptides and proteins: Status and developments in drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex MoreheadLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0586-6191
Nabin GiriLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0251-3956
Jian LiuElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, NextGen Precision Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO USA.
Pawan NeupaneElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, NextGen Precision Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO USA.
Jianlin ChengElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, NextGen Precision Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0305-2853

Funding

Integrated Prediction of Protein Struture at 1D, 2D and 3D LevelsR01GM093123 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CHENG, JIANLIN · 2010 to 2023
$3.8M
Deep learning methods for automated and accurate reconstruction of protein structures from cryo-EM image dataR01GM146340 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CHENG, JIANLIN · 2022 to 2025
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093123NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM146340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of ligand binding on protein structures and their in vivo functions carry numerous implications for modern biomedical research and biotechnology development efforts such as drug discovery. Although several deep learning (DL) methods and benchmarks designed for protein-ligand docking have recently been introduced, so far no previous works have systematically studied the behaviour of the latest docking and structure prediction methods within the broadly applicable context of: (1) using predicted (apo) protein structures for docking (for example, for applicability to new proteins); (2) binding multiple (cofactor) ligands concurrently to a given target protein (for example, for enzyme design); and (3) having no previous knowledge of binding pockets (for example, for generalization to unknown pockets). To enable a deeper understanding of the real-world utility of docking methods, we introduce PoseBench, a comprehensive benchmark for broadly applicable protein-ligand docking. PoseBench enables researchers to rigorously and systematically evaluate DL methods for apo-to-holo protein-ligand docking and protein-ligand structure prediction using both primary ligand and multiligand benchmark datasets, the latter of which we introduce to the DL community. Empirically, using PoseBench, we find that: (1) DL cofolding methods generally outperform comparable conventional and DL docking baseline algorithms, but popular methods such as AlphaFold 3 are still challenged by prediction targets with new protein-ligand binding poses; (2) certain DL cofolding methods are highly sensitive to their input multiple sequence alignments, whereas others are not; and (3) DL methods struggle to strike a balance between structural accuracy and chemical specificity when predicting new or multiligand protein targets.

Indexed as

Computational scienceComputer scienceMachine learningProtein structure predictionsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID41624973
PMCPMC12851923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.