ReviewRSC advances2026
Adhesion chemistry of plant-based cellulosic fibers and polymeric matrices in composites: a review.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance of geopolymer composites reinforced with treated date palm and polypropylene fibers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-based cellulosic fibers are often considered a preferred material choice for polymer composites due to growing environmental concerns. The hierarchical macro- and micro-structures of the reinforcing fibers determine the characteristics of fiber-matrix interfaces and performance of the composite. The non-aligned spatial orientation of cellulosic fibers (when used as discontinuous fibers in composites), variability in the fiber length and diameter, and heterogeneity in the chemical composition exert complex effects on the adhesion behavior in composites. Additionally, cellulosic fiber polymer composites exhibit limited interfacial compatibility with polymer matrices due to the hydrophilicity of the reinforcing materials. The review herein presents the dominant adhesion mechanisms of mechanical interlocking, chemical bonding, physical adhesion, and weak boundary layers and their impact on composite properties. Furthermore, this review studies the relationship between the cellulosic fiber structure-morphology-topography and adhesion mechanisms to address and counteract adhesion problems. For a given fiber diameter, an increase in the fiber length (up to a threshold value) increases the composite properties due to enhancement in adhesion properties. An increase in the fiber length enhances the mechanical interlocking within composites and is beneficial until it induces a curling effect. However, interfacial adhesion in composites decreases with the increase in the fiber or yarn twist due to the increase in compactness, decrease in porosity, and possible reorientation of the twisted fibers or yarns from the loading direction. The percentage cellulose content primarily determines the interface properties, while the non-cellulosic components, such as hemicellulose and lignin, contribute to the formation of weak boundary layers, adversely affecting the fiber-matrix adhesion behavior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.