Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624927›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of preventive medicine2025

Time Management and Work-Life Balance: A New Academic Paradigm.

Poonam Sharma, Lisa Chadha, Rajwant Kaur, Inu Arya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Poonam SharmaDepartment of Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Lisa ChadhaNursing Tutor, College Of Nursing Aiims Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Rajwant KaurDepartment of Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Inu AryaDepartment of Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of work-life balance (WLB) has gained significant attention in recent years, particularly within the academic sector, where faculty face unique challenges due to the multifaceted demands of teaching, research, and administration. This manuscript examines the significance of WLB for academicians, emphasizing the hurdles they encounter in achieving balance, including the pressures of a publish-or-perish culture and the frequent blurring of boundaries between professional and personal time. Despite the perceived flexibility of academic work, many faculty members find it challenging to disengage from professional obligations, resulting in heightened stress and reduced personal time. To address these challenges, the manuscript introduces the emerging "hourly need" approach, which advocates for real-time management of daily stressors to mitigate burnout and enhance sustainable productivity. Additionally, it outlines effective strategies for promoting WLB, such as institutional support for flexible work arrangements, effective time management practices, and the implementation of wellness programs. By cultivating a culture that prioritizes work-life balance, academic institutions can significantly improve faculty well-being, retention, and overall job satisfaction. Ultimately, this manuscript aims to contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding work-life balance in academia, providing insights and recommendations that enable academicians to navigate their professional and personal lives more effectively. Through this exploration, it seeks to underscore the critical importance of WLB in fostering a healthy and productive academic environment.

Indexed as

Academiafaculty well-beingflexible work arrangementshourly need approachinstitutional supportjob satisfactionstress managementwork-life balance

Identifiers

PMID41624927
PMCPMC12857901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.