ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Identification and validation of an endotoxin tolerance-based prognostic model with therapeutic insights in sepsis.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis outcomes remain difficult to predict because immune trajectories are heterogeneous and dynamically shift from early activation to immunosuppression. Endotoxin tolerance (ET) in circulating monocytes/macrophages is a key mechanism of sepsis-associated immunosuppression but has not been systematically leveraged for prognostication. We sought to develop and clinically validate an ET-related gene (ETG) signature for short-term mortality risk stratification. Method: Public whole-blood transcriptomic datasets were intersected with curated ET gene sets to derive ETG candidates. An ensemble machine-learning framework (108 model/feature-selection combinations across 12 algorithms) was used to build and rank prognostic models for 28-day mortality; the final parsimonious signature (10 ETGs, including IL4R, ATM, CX3CR1, FCGR1A) informed a risk score. A two-variable nomogram (age + ETG risk score) was constructed. Internal performance was assessed by bootstrapped calibration, time-dependent ROC/AUC at 7, 14, and 28 days, and Harrell's C-index. Experimental validation used a prospective ICU cohort (n=50; 13 survivors, 37 non-survivors). PBMCs were profiled by RT-qPCR and Western blot; CD14 Results: The 10-gene ETG signature stratified mortality risk with acceptable discrimination and calibration. AUCs were 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.83), 0.78 (0.72-0.83), and 0.73 (0.67-0.78) at 7, 14, and 28 days, respectively; Harrell's C-index was 0.782. The age-integrated nomogram showed close agreement between predicted and observed survival across timepoints. Functional enrichment indicated immune-response pathways enriched in the low-risk group. In the clinical cohort, non-survivors exhibited lower mRNA and protein levels of FCGR1A, TLR5, and CX3CR1 in PBMCs; flow cytometry revealed reduced proportions of FCGR1A Conclusion: An ET-anchored, 10-gene signature captures a clinically relevant axis of sepsis-associated immunosuppression and enables short-term mortality risk stratification. Integration with age yields a simple nomogram with stable internal performance. Multilayer validation (transcript, protein, single-cell) supports biological plausibility. Prospective multicenter studies with richer clinical annotation and functional assays are warranted to confirm generalizability and to evaluate ET-guided immunomodulatory strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.