ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
High CRP and white blood cell counts are not reliable indicators of early-onset neonatal infection in full-term infants.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diagnosing neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) is challenging, making it difficult to determine infection indicator characteristics and cutoff values in full-term infants. This study retrospectively analyzed full-term infants with high-risk factors for neonatal EOS but tested negative for EOS, aiming to identify infection indicator characteristics and their association with perinatal factors without antibiotic intervention. Methods: Full-term infants at high risk for EOS who were admitted to rooming-in from 1 July 2023 to 29 February 2024 were included in the study. Blood routine examinations and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were dynamically monitored after birth. All demographic data and medical records were collected from the electronic medical records system. Results: Among 103 neonates, only 2 had normal infection indicators. Within 24-48 h after birth, an additional 28 displayed normal infection indicators. Although most of the infants exhibited normal WBC within 24-48 h, 33 patients still had higher neutrophil percentages, and 62 had higher CRP levels. Moreover, several high-risk perinatal factors for abnormal infection indicators have been identified. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that infection indicators frequently showed abnormalities in full-term infants at high risk for EOS who tested negative. Few infants had normal infection indicators within 24 h, and although WBC levels normalized by 24-48 h, CRP levels remained elevated. Specific perinatal factors were also associated with abnormal infection markers. These findings reinforce the need for cautious interpretation of isolated biomarker elevations and support antimicrobial stewardship by highlighting the high frequency of abnormal indicators in uninfected infants, thereby reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.