ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Evidence summary for pain management during retinopathy of prematurity screening.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the leading causes of childhood blindness. Routine ROP screening in high-risk preterm infants is a fundamental and effective measure to prevent ROP; however, this screening process could cause pain to infants. This study aims to summarize the best evidence for pain management during ROP screening and provide a reference for the clinical practice of medical staff. Methods: We systematically searched the literature on pain management during ROP screening, including clinical practice guidelines, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical decision support tools, and expert consensus statements. The search period was from inception to 31 October 2024. Four reviewers independently evaluated the quality of guidelines, and two reviewers independently assessed the quality of systematic reviews and expert consensus statements. Subsequently, evidence was extracted and graded. Results: Eighteen articles were included: six guidelines, three clinical decision support tools, six systematic reviews, and three expert consensus statements. 92 pieces of evidence were extracted and categorized into five dimensions: multidisciplinary pain management teams for ROP screening, pain assessment, non-pharmacological interventions, pharmacological interventions and pain documentation. Twenty-five evidence-based recommendations were finally formulated. Conclusion: The best evidence-based strategies for pain management during ROP screening in preterm infants provide actionable guidance for clinical practice. Medical staff should strengthen training in neonatal pain management and implement combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate procedural pain during ROP screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.