ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2025
Barrett High-Grade Dysplasia and Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Patients With Positive Results on a Nonendoscopic Methylated DNA Biomarker Test.
Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Barrett esophagus (BE) is the precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), with an at-risk screening population clearly defined by gastroenterology society guidelines. BE with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early EAC are actionable diagnoses, where endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is effective in avoiding progression to invasive EAC. EsoGuard (EG) is a methylated DNA biomarker assay performed on esophageal cells collected nonendoscopically with EsoCheck (EC) to facilitate in-office BE screening. This case series presents 4 cases of HGD/early EAC diagnosed in patients who first tested positive on EG. Case presentations: Two patients met American College of Gastroenterology guideline criteria for BE screening, and 2 lacked chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) but met other risk criteria. The patients with chronic GERD had well-controlled symptoms on proton pump inhibitors, and none of the patients had ever previously undergone screening for BE with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). All 4 patients underwent confirmatory EGD after receiving positive EG results, with HGD diagnosed on biopsy specimens. All patients were subsequently referred to advanced endoscopists for EET, during which time a T1a lesion was identified in 1 patient's endoscopic mucosal resection specimen. All achieved complete disease eradication after EET. Conclusion: These cases demonstrate EG/EC as an in-office nonendoscopic triage test that facilitated the timely diagnosis and subsequent treatment of HGD/early EAC in 4 patients who would otherwise not have undergone screening EGD and would have been at risk for progression to EAC. EG/EC allows BE screening in nonspecialized facilities and may be a reasonable option for patients who have not already been referred for endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41624798PMC12853724What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.