Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624774›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in urology2025

Demographic and prognostic landscape of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: an analysis of a national cancer database.

Beau Hsia, Mark Moroz, Ethan Sipes, Amber Chang, Rania Jundi, Susan Rafie, Peter Silberstein, Abubakar Tauseef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beau Hsia *Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Mark Moroz *Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Ethan SipesGrand Canyon University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Amber ChangUniversity of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, United States.
Rania JundiArizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Susan RafieMidwestern University Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, CA, United States.
Peter SilbersteinCHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Abubakar TauseefCHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an uncommon malignancy of the urogenital tract with a wide range of clinical outcomes. While prognostic factors for bladder-based UC are established, less is known about tumors in other locations and the impact of socioeconomic disparities. This study uses a large national database to identify key demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic predictors of overall survival in UC patients, focusing on the primary tumor site. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 12,300 patients diagnosed with UC of the kidney and renal pelvis between 2004 and 2020 from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the association between overall survival and factors including patient demographics, tumor characteristics, primary tumor site, and socioeconomic status. Results: The cohort was predominantly male (59%) and White (91%), with a mean age of 71 at diagnosis. Multivariable analysis identified several factors significantly associated with survival. Renal pelvis tumors, the most common primary site (84.9%), were associated with significantly improved survival (HR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.8-0.9; p<0.001). Compared to males, females exhibited a 15% lower hazard of death (HR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.81-0.90; p<0.001). Factors associated with worse survival included a higher Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score (HR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.39-1.65; p<0.001) and advanced NCDB tumor stage. Socioeconomically, patients with higher income (HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.75-0.90; p<0.001) and private insurance or Medicare (HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.57-0.87; p<0.001) had improved survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower hazard of death (HR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95; p=0.007), whereas primary radiation therapy was associated with a higher hazard of death (HR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.54-1.86; p<0.001). Conclusion: This large-scale analysis identifies the primary tumor site as a key prognostic factor in UC, with renal pelvis tumors demonstrating more favorable survival. The study also confirms the significant influence of comorbidity and tumor stage while uniquely highlighting that socioeconomic factors, such as income and insurance, are powerful predictors of outcome. These findings underscore the need for optimized, site-specific treatment strategies and concerted efforts to address healthcare inequities in the management of upper tract UC.

Indexed as

NCDBprimary anatomical siteprognostic variablesurogenital systemurothelial carcinoma (UC)

Identifiers

PMID41624774
PMCPMC12855052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.