ArticleCJC pediatric and congenital heart disease2025
Painting of 3D Models of Congenital Heart Disease as an Educational Tool for Pediatric Residents.
Article in CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) models of congenital heart diseases have been used to teach cardiac anatomy to learners. Our team sought to determine whether the painting of 3D models could help pediatric residents better understand both the anatomy and physiology of complex congenital heart diseases. Methods: This was a prospective assessment of pediatric resident perceptions regarding a novel teaching method on the 3 stages of palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. After attending a didactic session about the topic, they were provided with 3D models representing each stage. They were guided in painting them to represent the presumed oxygen saturations of each model's chambers. Questionnaires were used to assess the self-perceived understanding of the anatomy, pathophysiology, and management from before to after the session using 5-point Likert scales. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired samples Results: There were 36 pediatric residents from 2 institutions. There was an increase in the mean self-perceived understanding of the anatomy (2.14 vs 3.94, Conclusion: Painting of 3D models increased knowledge acquisition among pediatric residents.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.