Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624752›Full record

ArticleCJC pediatric and congenital heart disease2025

Physician Perception of Fontan Failure, "Acceptable" Hemodynamics, Assessment, and Indications for Intervention-Results of a Multinational Survey.

Ashish H Shah, Evan J Wiens, Jonathan Windram, Shakeel A Qureshi, Petra Jenkins, Isma Rafiq, Erwin Oechslin, Richard A Krasuski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ashish H ShahDepartment of Cardiology, St. Boniface Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Evan J WiensDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jonathan WindramDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Shakeel A QureshiDepartment of Cardiology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Petra JenkinsDepartment of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Isma RafiqDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Erwin OechslinToronto Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, University Hospital Network, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Richard A KrasuskiDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with complex congenital heart disease unfit for biventricular repair are often palliated with Fontan circulation (FC), which obviates the need for a subpulmonary ventricle. This approach has led to high survival rates, with over 80% of patients expected to live beyond 30 years. Despite increasing patient numbers and existing guidelines, there are no standardized hemodynamic parameters defining Fontan failure, resulting in considerable variability in management practices. This pilot project aimed to assess real-world practices in FC patient management, particularly in surveillance, defining Fontan circulatory failure, and determining treatment thresholds. Methods: A cross-sectional survey with 10 multiple-choice questions and optional free-form responses was distributed globally to congenital heart disease cardiologists through 2 academic centers. Conducted from January to December 2021, the survey targeted clinicians managing adult FC patients. Results: Of 310 invited cardiologists, 170 (55%) participated, including 27% from the United States, 22% from Canada, and 20% from the United Kingdom. Respondents included pediatric (37%), adult congenital (47%), and dual trained adult/pediatric cardiologists (14%), mostly in academic settings (94%). Variability existed in defining FC failure, with markers such as protein-losing enteropathy (74%), fatigue/dyspnea (62%), and elevated Fontan pressure (58%) commonly cited. Responses differed on defining elevated Fontan pressure, with 53% selecting >15 mm Hg, 33% >18 mm Hg, and 14% >20 mm Hg. Ninety-one percent prescribed pulmonary vasodilators, though indications and thresholds varied. Conclusion: Substantial heterogeneity in FC patient management currently exists, underscoring the need for standardized hemodynamic parameters.

Identifiers

PMID41624752
PMCPMC12859612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.