Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624750›Full record

ReviewBurns & trauma2026

The role of artificial intelligence in burn assessment, complication diagnosis, and outcome prediction: a narrative review.

Punit Bhattachan, Zachary Ricciuti, Fadi Khalaf, Marc G Jeschke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Burns & trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Bias in Burn Care: A Literature Review of Ethical Challenges.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Punit BhattachanDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Zachary RicciutiCentre for Burn Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, 20 Copeland Ave, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Fadi KhalafCentre for Burn Research, Hamilton Health Sciences, 20 Copeland Ave, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.
Marc G JeschkeDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0870-1664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn injury remains a major global health challenge, causing an estimated 180 000 deaths annually. The marked heterogeneity in burn severity, complications, and outcomes highlights the need for more objective and efficient evaluation strategies. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising approach to support clinical decision-making and improve patient care in this field. In this narrative review, we summarize the growing applications of AI in burn care, including the assessment of burn depth and total body surface area, monitoring of wound healing, prediction of postburn complications, and estimation of clinical outcomes. AI-based models have demonstrated strong performance in automating wound assessment, optimizing fluid resuscitation, and predicting complications such as sepsis, inhalation injury, and acute kidney injury. Furthermore, AI-driven prediction of mortality risk and hospital length of stay has shown potential to inform early interventions and improve resource allocation. Despite encouraging progress, most studies to date rely on small, single-center datasets and limited model validation, underscoring the need for larger, multi-institutional efforts, and standardized data sharing. Integrating AI into burn management holds great promise for enhancing diagnostic precision, forecasting outcomes, and personalizing treatment strategies. As these technologies advance, clinician familiarity and collaboration with AI tools will be critical to fully realize their potential in transforming burn care.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryArtificial intelligenceBurn injuryComplicationsDeep learningInhalation injuryMachine learningPredictive modelsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID41624750
PMCPMC12860198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.